![]()
In part two of my adventure into the world of direct auditory injections, I examined the experience of listening to podcasts whilst going about my daily life. Would moving from the world of melody to the world of words change my perception of the earphone culture?
Well, I made a number of observations about how my listening habits quickly evolved and how this relates to the types of podcast I am looking to create as part of my new media work, to find out…
Observations:
* Spoken word podcasts are more difficult to listen to whilst moving around, as the background noise can distract, making it difficult to concentrate and therefore follow a thread. Music, by contrast, being both immersive and background in nature means you can disengage your concentration and then re-engage without loosing much of the meaning. As a result, podcasts seem to be suited to travelling situations – cars, public transport etc, where interruptions are less likely.
* I preferred listening to podcasts on longer journeys (either 30 minute-long Radio 4 programmes or lectures, or a series of shorter pieces, such as extracts from the Today programme or Thought For The Day, which are on average between 2 and 8 minutes in length) whilst I preferred listening to music on shorter journeys.
* I generally had to adjust the volume on a more regular basis to hear the podcasts clearly, whereas I didn’t often feel this was necessary with music. This resulted in a lot more fiddling with the device, which was not always practical.
* It was not really possible to achieve the effect of a shuffle with podcast tracks. This is obviously more of a device issue, but I think it is fairly generic. With music, I could press shuffle and my playlist would be fed to me with minimum decision-making from myself. However, I had to actively select each podcast in turn, which again meant more fiddling. (I may, of course, now find a way of doing this, in which case I will feel like a bit of a spanner!)
Thoughts:
* Most of the podcasts I subscribed to were monophonic, which may explain my difficulty immersing when there are other real world sounds and events to distract. My own work is polyphonic, involving layers of speech, elements of music and some effects. Will this help to improve the immersing capacity of my work if the audience are listening on the move, compared to the types of podcast I have been testing here? Until now, my experience of podcasts both as a listener and a creator has been to engage through a computer, so the experience of listening is very much the same as listening to the radio. However, by nature podcasts should be engaging whilst on the move, with all the distracting features I have previously noted taken into account. Maybe the additional layers, which until now have just been slight enhancements to my work, will actually be a more important factor as I design my work for its publication environment.
* Most of the podcasts available are information-based, rather than creative. The podcasts I found that were fiction-based were generally serialisations of longer pieces – usually the equivalent of an audio book by installments, or podcasts of Radio 4’s programming. Admittedly, I am only searching for podcasts with rss feeds in the iTunes directory, so this may not be an accurate picture of the types of content available in this format. However, it would be interesting to explore further to see what is out there and why this trend exists. It is also important for me as I work out where to position my work in order to reach an audience.
Well, this has certainly been an experience. Since carrying out these experiments I have not actually become addicted to either form of constant entertainment. It is a strange world in which people have such a variety of content injected into their ears whilst performing other functions. I just like listening alone…




Recent Comments